Tortured by 'Moderates'
Tortured by 'Moderates'
http://www.weeklystandard.com/tortured-by-moderates/article/2009241
Hassan
Rouhani was sworn in for his second term as president of Iran on August
5, surrounded by fresh flowers, fervent followers, and around 500
foreign officials. Representatives of the United Kingdom, France, the
United Nations, and the Vatican rubbed shoulders with the Syrian prime
minister, Hezbollah second-in-command Naim Qassem, Palestinian Islamic
Jihad leader and FBI Most Wanted Terrorists list member Ramadan Abdullah
Shallah, and murderous Zimbabwean dictator Robert Mugabe. The
Westerners didn’t seem uncomfortable in such company; indeed, European
Union foreign policy chief Federica Mogherini was described as the star
of the show after Iranian members of parliament elbowed through the
crowd to take selfies with the diplomat.
But
why should they have been bothered? They were in Tehran, after all, to
celebrate the renewed rule of a man who has overseen a steady increase
in killings—Iran has the world’s highest per capita execution rate.
Three days before Rouhani’s inauguration, Amnesty International released
a damning report on conditions in the country: “Iran’s judicial and
security bodies have waged a vicious crackdown against human rights
defenders since Hassan Rouhani became president in 2013, demonizing and
imprisoning activists who dare to stand up for people’s rights.” The
press release capping Mogherini’s visit didn’t mention the
European-based organization’s report—or human rights issues at
all—instead focusing on “the EU’s unwavering commitment to” the Joint
Comprehensive Plan of Action nuclear deal. It’s unlikely Mogherini
brought up the subject even in her private meetings: She was pictured
smiling in multiple photo-ops with government officials.
A
month earlier, a young Iranian woman told me how she and her fellow
reformers feel when they see such images. “We know with every
negotiation with this regime, every shaking hand with this regime, it
means one more gallows in the streets,” Shabnam Madadzadeh said sadly.
“They close their eyes to human rights in Iran,” she said of Westerners
who deal with the regime and many members of the media who report on it.
“They kill humanity, in themselves firstly, and after that in Iran.”
Madadzadeh
speaks with a seriousness that belies her age. In a hound’s-tooth
blazer, black pants, glasses with wine-colored frames, and a headscarf
in shades of deep rose, the 29-year-old unfurled her passion in complete
paragraphs. Her mustachioed and bespectacled 32-year-old brother,
Farzad, wore a black suit and white shirt, sans tie. Intense but
friendly, he continued his sister’s thought: “The biggest mistake that
anybody can make when looking at Iran is to distinguish between Rouhani
and [Supreme Leader Ali] Khamenei. If you just look at the law related
to the elections in Iran, nobody can become president of Iran unless
Khamenei has endorsed them. So whatever differences they have on one
thing, they are united maintaining this regime, keeping it in power at
any cost.”
It’s
no surprise the pair project a certain depth. Shabnam and Farzad
Madadzadeh spent five years as political prisoners in Iran. The siblings
were tortured in front of each other and repeatedly threatened with
execution. They fled the country: separately, illegally, dangerously.
What is extraordinary is that after so lately enduring such horrors,
never knowing if they’d make it out alive—and learning that many friends
did not—they’re able not only to smile but laugh repeatedly in the
course of a five-hour conversation. They were joined in the lobby of a
Paris airport hotel by a fellow dissident, Arash Mohammadi. He had the
same mustache as his countryman but wore a blue blazer, blue pants, and a
blue checked shirt. He’s only 25 but can be as grave as the
Madadzadehs. A jocularity comes through in his playful smile,
however—even though he’s been jailed three times, enduring torture in
each stint.
All
three escaped from Iran recently: Shabnam less than a year ago, Arash
about a year ago, and Farzad just under two years ago. And here they
were, cracking up in mirth watching a YouTube video. They’d wanted me to
see an example of the work of Mohsen, a comedian whose parodies make Pake Shadi the
most popular program on a subversive satellite television network. He’s
so famous in Iran that even prison interrogators mention his material.
In this one, he inserted himself into state television footage of the
funeral earlier this year of former Iranian president Hashemi
Rafsanjani. Khamenei watches as Mohsen leads the crowd in a chant of
mourning. In the front row, top regime officials—notorious thugs such as
Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps commander Mohammad Ali Jafari and
Quds Force leader Qassem Suleimani—play up their grief for the camera.
Mohsen intones, “Hashemi is waiting for us; let’s go” . . . to hell.
The comedian notes that Rafsanjani, as a founder of the Islamic
Republic, was buried next to longtime supreme leader Ruhollah Khomeini:
“Now it is Khamenei’s turn!” In between laughs, the Iranians explain
just how provocative the video is. “So in the middle of the mourning
ritual, he starts dancing like that. It’s ripping all the taboos,” said
Hanif Jazayeri, the men’s translator. “And this means that Hashemi is
waiting for Rouhani,” added Shabnam, who speaks fluent English.
The
video is a high-quality production and YouTube offers an English
translation. But Westerners might need explication anyway: Rafsanjani
and Rouhani are regularly referred to in the West, by politicians and
the press, as “moderates.” The Iranians find that notion almost as
hilarious as Mohsen’s satire. I read them a line from the recent
election analysis of a major American newspaper: “Many Iranians
gravitate toward Mr. Rouhani because of his relatively tolerant views on
freedom of expression.” All three laughed heartily. But the talk soon
turned serious.
“If
there was freedom of expression in Iran, what are we three doing here? I
mean, leaving behind your family is not easy, you know? We had to leave
our university, our family, our best friends,” Arash said. When they do
talk to people back home, they do so very carefully—contact with
escaped dissidents could mean imprisonment for their friends and family.
The trio did not want the exact dates of their escapes published, nor
the location of their current homes, other than that they’re in Europe.
The siblings don’t even live in the same city, for security reasons.
Iranian
foreign minister Javad Zarif declared in a 2015 interview with Charlie
Rose, “We do not jail people for their opinions. The government has a
plan to improve, enhance human rights in the country, as every
government should.” The PBS interviewer did not question these claims.
Neither did the many friendly—almost gushing—reporters Zarif spoke with
on his visit to the United States last month. Arash Mohammadi and
Shabnam and Farzad Madadzadeh provide more evidence—if any is
needed—that such statements are simply lies.
Shabnam
and Farzad were arrested in 2009, before the uprisings over the
suspicious reelection results of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad that
would turn into the Green Movement. They were seized on the street.
Their family, not knowing what had happened, called hospitals to see if
they’d been in an accident and searched for the pair for months. Shabnam
was studying computer science at Tehran’s Tarbiat Moalem University and
was a leader in the reformist student group Tahkim-e Vahdat. Farzad was
a nonviolent activist and supporter of the resistance group People’s
Mojahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI), best known in the West for
revealing details of the regime’s theretofore hidden nuclear program. “I
was 23 when I was arrested, and the torture started then,” Farzad
recounted. He and his sister were held separately in solitary
confinement for months. Questioning would begin around 8 a.m. and last
12 to 14 hours. “In each of the interrogation sessions, I was beaten.
They wanted me to confess to crimes that I had not committed,” Farzad
said. They wanted him to publicly renounce the PMOI (also called
Mujahedin-e Khalq, or MEK) and the National Council of Resistance of
Iran. “They told me, ‘You come and do an interview against the PMOI, the
MEK, and the NCRI,’ ” he said. “They would throw me on the ground and
treat me like a football between three people. . . . Several times
they did this to me in front of Shabnam’s eyes in order to break her.”
His
sister will never forget her own months in solitary confinement. “The
interrogator told me, ‘Okay, nobody can hear you. We are alone here, and
we can do everything we want.’ ” She could regularly hear the voices of
other prisoners being tortured; some later told her they had been
raped. She was tortured herself, and the only time she could see her
brother was when they brought him to be tortured in front of her. Even
after she left solitary confinement, she was often deprived of the few
visits allowed with family because she told them about the appalling
conditions of the prisons and the gruesome treatment of prisoners. Four
people would share a cell, with three thin blankets each to sleep on;
windows would be left open even in winter. Captives were taken to use
the bathroom just three times a day, and not at times of their choosing.
Having to hold it in gave Shabnam serious medical problems. “About 11
months to a year after our arrest, there was a trial. For five minutes,
it lasted,” Farzad said. They were both given five-year sentences and
moved from Evin Prison to the even harsher Gohardasht Prison.
“Many
of my friends during this period that I was in prison, they were
executed. Some of them, they died in front of my eyes because of the
illnesses they had or because they were tortured so much and because of
their conditions they died in front of me,” Farzad reported. He can
rattle off the names of friends executed after death sentences. “Ali
Saremi. Jafar Kazemi. Mamadali Hojari. Farzad Kamangar. Farhad Vakili.”
Mohsen Dokmechi died of pancreatic cancer after jailers refused him
medical treatment.
He
expected the same fate. “I remember the moment that I was arrested,
taken to the car, and I was in front of the door of Ward 209 of Evin. I
told myself, ‘You’re going in here, but you’re not coming out of here.’
Because I knew where I had come. Because I had heard what happens here.”
While
the siblings each served one long sentence, Arash had multiple shorter
stints in prison: He was arrested twice under President Ahmadinejad and
once under President Rouhani. He was a 19-year-old studying industrial
management at Tabriz University when he started gathering with other
students concerned about the plight of workers in the country,
especially children (factory work can start at ages as young as 6 or 7,
and drug addiction with it). “If somebody just goes and walks down the
streets for 10 minutes, maybe they would see a hundred kids working on
the streets,” Arash said. Besides toiling in factories, children sell
small items: chewing gum, socks, even “luck poems,” often randomly
chosen excerpts from the work of 14th-century Persian poet Hafez. “If
they don’t work, they will be starving,” Arash said. “When the
government rounds them up and arrests them, instead of assisting them,
helping them with their problems, they take them” to juvenile correction
facilities, where the conditions can be worse than on the streets.
“They are even raped there, in those centers.” He knows of a 9-year-old
girl who worked in a sewing factory who underwent such trauma.
“The
main problem is that the Iranian government actually doesn’t even
acknowledge that such a problem exists,” Arash said. Calling attention
to it was an implicit criticism of the government. “Although we were
campaigning for children’s rights or worker’s rights, they would charge
us for things like insulting the supreme leader, insulting the
sanctities, and things that nowhere in the world is a charge,” he said.
“Because the Iranian regime, they want to say that this is the best
place on earth. Neither during our time in prison, neither now, the
regime does not accept that it has political prisoners.” Arash was taken
from his home at 5 a.m. “They told my family, ‘We have to speak to him
for about an hour, then he’ll come back.’ ” He spent a couple of weeks
in solitary confinement and was sentenced to a year in prison. “They
constantly brought a paper in front of us and said, ‘Either you have to
answer these questions like this, or you’re going to be executed.’ ”
He
was next arrested after trying to aid victims of the 2012 earthquakes
in the Iranian province of Azerbaijan. “The government didn’t want
people to know what had happened there,” Arash said. It wasn’t the
natural disaster the regime was trying to hide. “There were a number of
villages that didn’t have even the basic of facilities like electricity,
water,” he reported. “The IRGC, the Revolutionary Guards, had come
there and they had closed off the routes to the villages.” Dozens of
people were arrested for trying to help victims and locate survivors
trapped under the rubble.
“The
primary thing of importance for the regime is for the people not to
become alert as to the problems that exist there. That’s their
number-one priority,” Arash said. “It’s 100 percent a danger as a threat
to the regime because it’ll become clear that for 38, 39 years, this
government has done nothing for the people.”
Arash
was detained yet again the day after Rouhani was announced the winner
of the 2013 presidential race. “During his election and campaigning, he
had promised to free all political prisoners. And so as soon as it was
announced, we went in front of his campaign headquarters, and we started
to chant, ‘All political prisoners must be freed,’ ” Arash said. He
quickly became one himself.
That
third stint in prison was the final straw. He realized that if he
didn’t leave the country, he’d eventually be sentenced to death. Farzad
and Shabnam also made the difficult decision to flee. “When I was
released from prison, immediately a lot of problems started to come
about, and I was being followed and being monitored,” Farzad said. “I
couldn’t work. I couldn’t get by, live.”
Shabnam
had the same experience. “When I was released, they didn’t allow me to
continue my studies. They didn’t allow me to have a job.” She still
worries about her female friends, especially, “under the clutches of the
misogynistic regime.”
Recalling why he left his homeland reminded Arash why he started fighting for its freedom in the first place.
We
are some youth, and naturally no youth want to see hardship. The youth
of Iran are just like the youth in America and Europe. They want the
same things. But when we reached a certain age, we looked around us and
we saw that there are some things are happening, and people are being
killed in the streets. People are being hanged in the streets. We also
knew that in this regime, for the past 38 years there has been a
current, a faction, that constantly says, “We’re reformists, we’re
reformists.” But we saw that there was no reform. So we realized that
the dictatorship needs to be overthrown.
And
that is the heart of the matter: Western diplomats may pretend
otherwise, but the government over which Hassan Rouhani presides is a
dictatorship.
“As
far as I’m concerned, you can’t say that one dictator is better than
another dictator,” Arash said. “I was lashed in prison. For me, it did
not make a difference which government’s agents were lashing me. But the
pain of the lashes by Rouhani’s government were for me more painful.
Because during the Ahmadinejad administration, everybody accepted it:
Ahmadinejad was a dictator. But during Rouhani’s time, I felt, I saw
these lashes on me, but the West did not accept that was going on. So it
was much more painful for me.”
Of
course, the West also sometimes found it convenient to pretend that
Ahmadinejad was no dictator. Farzad recalled being in prison in 2009
when an influx of inmates arrived. Arrested supporters of the fledging
Green Movement told him of their cries: “Obama, Obama, are you with them
or with us?” “In Farsi, this rhymes, so it was a slogan that was
chanted in the streets. But what did Obama do? Obama secretly brought a
letter to Khamenei. . . . This was while people were being killed in
the streets,” Farzad said. “The policy of appeasement exists. Because
some people have vested interests.”
That
is a succinct summary of what Iranian freedom fighters would like from
the West: an end to the policy of appeasement. “I interpret the Iranian
regime like a statue, like this bottle here,” Arash said, grabbing a
one-liter glass bottle of Pellegrino on the table. “I believe the
foundation of this regime has been destroyed by the resistance.” He made
a digging motion underneath the bottle with one hand; with the other,
he started shaking the bottle back and forth slightly. (It seemed a
particularly Persian analogy: Engineering rivals poetry in popularity in
Iran.) He has seen the cracks himself, giving the example of
conversations in taxicabs. In Iran, no one has enough money to ride
alone. “When there are two, three people in a car, they are so
aggravated by the regime that they start to curse,” he said. (He was too
polite to report exact wording.)
Back
to the bottle: “But from the top, the appeasing governments in the West
have tied a string to it to not let it fall down and shatter. So 100
percent, those who are holding onto this string and keeping it there are
responsible for their role in it.” He is quick to point out that it’s
not just Iranians such a policy hurts. “For example, when Rafsanjani was
president and Rouhani was the secretary of the Supreme National
Security Council, the West kept on saying that this government is a
moderate government. But it was the same government that went into
Argentina and exploded the Jewish center. So this shows that when this
regime is appeased, it does not just cause suffering for the Iranian
people. This evilness is exported.”
They
point to the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action nuclear deal the West
signed with Iran in 2015 as a prime example. “This agreement, it gave
far more concessions than were necessary to this regime. They put the
money—cash—in an airplane. They sent it to Iran,” Farzad pointed out.
“None of that money reached the Iranian people. It reached Assad,
Hezbollah.” The Iranian government received $1.7 billion directly
through the deal. It will see billions more through deals the agreement
has made possible: Boeing, Airbus, Renault, Total S.A., and Siemens AG
are just some of the American and European companies lined up to do
business with the mullahs.
That
agreement was the prime focus of President Obama’s foreign policy and
the reason he wrote private letters to the supreme leader, but of course
Donald Trump is in power now. The three dissidents were in Paris in
July for an annual gathering of members and supporters of the National
Council of Resistance of Iran. Well over 100,000 people filled a stadium
near Charles de Gaulle airport to listen to speakers from all over the
world, including some Americans: former U.N. ambassador John Bolton,
former senator and vice presidential candidate Joseph Lieberman, and
Trump confidant Newt Gingrich. Throughout the weekend in Paris, from
activists and their supporters alike, rang a refrain not often heard in
Washington: optimism about the Trump administration. Most people were
quick to note that they don’t support all or even many of the
president’s policies. But they saw his tough talk about the nuclear deal
during the election as a sign his Iran policy would be very different
from his predecessor’s—perhaps even a “180-degree” turn, more than one
person said.
The
administration is conducting a review of Iran policy, which it plans to
finish by summer’s end. Some pundits worry that it will make “regime
change” the new goal of the United States. That’s precisely what these
Iranian dissidents are hoping for. But, contrary to the assumptions of
some supposed experts in Washington, “regime change” doesn’t have to be
by military force.
When
asked if they’d like to see America crush the Islamic Republic using
bombs and tanks, all three immediately shook their heads and
emphatically said no. Iranians can overthrow the theocracy from within,
they insist—if the West ends the aid and comfort that allow it to hold
onto power. “Definitely we have requests. We request that the West stop
supporting this dictatorship,” Arash concluded. “Based on the tally that
this regime has given, every day approximately three people are hanged
in Iran. So for every extra day that this regime is in power, more blood
is spilled in Iran. So if the U.S., and the West in general but in
particular the U.S., retracts the support that they have given this
regime, definitely both the people of Iran will achieve freedom sooner
and fewer lives will be lost.”
All they’re asking, in other words, is that the West let go of the string that’s holding up the teetering regime.

Comments
Post a Comment